Further support for changing multiple-choice answers
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Investigating the Effect of Changing Answers in Multiple-Choice Questions of Reading and Listening Tests in EFL Context
This study investigates whether the practice of answer changing on multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is beneficial for Iranian students’ overall test performance in EFL context. Several studies have shown that answer changing in multiple choice examinations is generally beneficial for improving scores. On the other hand, some studies have indicated that answer changing in multiple choice examina...
متن کاملImperfect Answers in Multiple Choice Questionnaires
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are the most common and computably tractable ways of assessing the knowledge of a student, but they restrain the students to express a precise answer that doesn’t really represent what they know, leaving no room for ambiguities or doubts. We propose Ev-MCQs (Evidential MCQs), an application of belief function theory for the management of the uncertainty and impr...
متن کاملNot all errors are created equal: metacognition and changing answers on multiple-choice tests.
Two experiments investigated the role of metacognition in changing answers to multiple-choice, general-knowledge questions. Both experiments revealed qualitatively different errors produced by speeded responding versus confusability amongst the alternatives; revision completely corrected the former, but had no effect on the latter. Experiment 2 also demonstrated that a pretest, designed to make...
متن کاملMULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY: with Answers and Comments
are discussed. Many of his views are controversial, but undoubtedly they are most stimulating. He has clear-cut thoughts on the pathology of many of the common painful conditions, but they cannot be considered to be anything more than theoretical. This volume will be invaluable to physiotherapists and their teachers, and it should be read by orthopaedic surgeons and rheumatologists. The product...
متن کاملLIMSI-CNRS@CLEF 2014: Invalidating Answers for Multiple Choice Question Answering
This paper describes our participation to the Entrance Exams Task of CLEF 2014’s Question Answering Track. The goal is to answer multiple-choice questions on short texts. Our system first retrieves passages relevant to the question, through lexical expansion involving a structured use of the Simple English Wiktionary and WordNet. Then it extracts predicate-argument structures (PAS) from each an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Academic Medicine
سال: 1985
ISSN: 1040-2446
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198506000-00012